Priority 13 from the Seniors' Health (Alberta, Canada) PSP
UNCERTAINTY: What is the most effective strategy for information sharing and collaboration between healthcare providers of different disciplines and/or at different facilities in order to ensure continuity of care? (JLA PSP Priority 13) | |
---|---|
Overall ranking | 13 |
JLA question ID | 0083/13 |
Explanatory note |
The health care of older people is best provided by teams of care providers, rather than a single person, called inter-professional teams. People wanted evidence on the best ways for these teams to share information effectively so that the care they deliver is seamless for the older people for whom they care |
Evidence |
1. Guide to enhancing referrals and consultations between physicians. (2009, October). Retrieved from http://www.cfpc.ca/ProjectAssets/Templates/Resource.aspx?id=3448 |
Health Research Classification System category | Generic health relevance |
Extra information provided by this PSP | |
---|---|
Original uncertainty examples | Personally, I have found my own specialist and family physician do not communicate with one another. There are no common communication links to share information or knowledge. ~ Get all physicians connected so they can access documentation/history about patients and be more accurate when diagnosing and treating. ~ poor communication /sharing of information between health professionals treating the same individual ~ Linkages between services (acute/home/ living environments ~ It seems like there are many silos of care provided, and that collaboration proves to be challenging. |
Submitted by | Health/Social care provider 16, Caregiver 16, Older Adult 8 |
PSP information | |
---|---|
PSP unique ID | 0083 |
PSP name | Seniors' Health (Alberta, Canada) |
Total number of uncertainties identified by this PSP. | 97 (To see a full list of all uncertainties identified, please see the detailed spreadsheet held on the JLA website) |
Date of priority setting workshop | 13 August 2018 |