Priority 6 from the Pessary use for Prolapse PSP
UNCERTAINTY: What is the best way to assess what type and size of pessary to use? (JLA PSP Priority 6) | |
---|---|
Overall ranking | 6 |
JLA question ID | 0054/6 |
Explanatory note | Many different pessaries are available for clinicians to choose from but there is no evidence to help make the decision. Pessary manufacturers offer a guide as to which pessary works best with which type of prolapse but this has not been tested with enough studies to answer the question. Examples: Are there different sizes to fit different women? What technique of assessing for size/shape of pessary results in best fit/retention/comfort? How big can you progress with the Pessaries if they continue to fall out? |
Evidence |
None identified |
Health Research Classification System category | Renal and urogenital |
Extra information provided by this PSP | |
---|---|
Original uncertainty examples |
What is the most effective way of assessing the size of pessary to use? ~ Why do pessaries seem to be so difficult to size correctly? |
Submitted by | 4 x women, 9 x healthcare professionals |
PSP information | |
---|---|
PSP unique ID | 0054 |
PSP name | Pessary use for Prolapse |
Total number of uncertainties identified by this PSP. | 66 (To see a full list of all uncertainties identified, please see the detailed spreadsheet held on the JLA website) |
Date of priority setting workshop | 8 September 2017 |