Priority 9 from the Mild to Moderate Hearing Loss PSP
UNCERTAINTY: How realistic are hearing tests for assessing the everyday hearing abilities of adults with mild to moderate hearing loss? (JLA PSP Priority 9) | |
---|---|
Overall ranking | 9 |
JLA question ID | 0033/9 |
Explanatory note | Not available for this PSP |
Evidence | To follow |
Health Research Classification System category | Ear |
Extra information provided by this PSP | |
---|---|
Original uncertainty examples |
How true a picture is a hearing test? Is it possible I indicate I can hear a sound but it doesn't inform how it's heard? Eg distortion of sound? ~ How does the audiologist take into account the difference in my hearing in the quiet and when I'm concentrating hard in a hearing test, and my everyday hearing when I am doing other things? ~ How do you know what you can hear in a quiet sound proof room? ~ How good are hearing tests at identifying real life hearing problems (listening to sounds in a soundproof room is not realistic) ~ To what extent is the pure-tone audiogram a poor predictor of benefit from hearing aids for those mild to moderate hearing loss? ~ More Realistic Hearing Tests. All hearing tests I have had were to respond to a single voice yet we hear and understand different voices quite differently. ~ To what extent can speech-in-noise tests (e.g. Quick SIN and the ANL test) provide information which cannot be obtained from the pure-tone audiogram alone and can such additional information enhance the rehabilitation outcomes for those fitted with hearing aids? |
Submitted by | Service users x 7, Clinicians x 2, Others x 1 |
Outcomes to be measured | Ecological validity of hearing assessment |
PSP information | |
---|---|
PSP unique ID | 0033 |
PSP name | Mild to Moderate Hearing Loss |
Total number of uncertainties identified by this PSP. | 87 (To see a full list of all uncertainties identified, please see the detailed spreadsheet held on the JLA website) |
Date of priority setting workshop | 3 September 2015 |