Priority 8 from the Foot Health PSP
| UNCERTAINTY: What evidence is there that foot health research is used in clinical practice and the impact that it has on clinical outcomes? (JLA PSP Priority 8) | |
|---|---|
| Overall ranking | 8 |
| JLA question ID | 0092/8 |
| Explanatory note | Despite a growing body of evidence (although currently limited in scope and quality overall), there is a need to demonstrate the usability and impact that foot health research has on clinical outcomes for patients, practitioners and health service commissioners |
| Evidence |
J Foot Ankle Res. 2017 Nov 22;10:51. doi: 10.1186/s13047-017-0232-3. eCollection 2017. Evidence for current recommendations concerning the management of foot health for people with chronic long-term conditions: a systematic review. Edwards K(1), Borthwick A(2), McCulloch L(2), Redmond A(3), Pinedo-Villanueva R(1), Prieto-Alhambra D(1), Judge A(1), Arden N(1), Bowen C(1)(2). |
| Health Research Classification System category | Generic health relevance |
| Extra information provided by this PSP | |
|---|---|
| Original uncertainty examples |
How do the results of research into treatments get adopted into clinical practice? ~ what is the impact over time (of research) on individual patients and groups of patients? |
| Submitted by | Healthcare professional x 4, Other x 2 |
| PSP information | |
|---|---|
| PSP unique ID | 0092 |
| PSP name | Foot Health |
| Total number of uncertainties identified by this PSP. | 30 (To see a full list of all uncertainties identified, please see the detailed spreadsheet held on the JLA website) |
| Date of priority setting workshop | 26 September 2019 |