Surgical Priority 1 from the Early Hip and Knee Osteoarthritis PSP
UNCERTAINTY: Taking cost into account what is the most effective treatment for early OA between surgical and non surgical treatments? (JLA PSP Surgical Priority 1) | |
---|---|
Overall ranking amongst surgical questions | 1 |
JLA question ID | 0041/1 |
Extra explanatory note | Outcomes; Measures for surgical priorities should reflect changes in tissue, and patient outcomes Merits or otherwise of doing research comparing different sorts of surgery rather than comparing surgery with no surgery? |
Evidence | 2 x NICE Clinical Knowledge Summaries for hip and for knee (2015) neither of which address this question specifically http://cks.nice.org.uk/osteoarthritis |
Health Research Classification System category | Musculoskeletal |
Extra information provided by this PSP | |
---|---|
Original uncertainty examples | I realise that the cost of the replacement joints, their life span and a surgeons time all equate to the tendency to delay needed operations that could prolong an individuals normally healthy life style. Is there any research being done into a more cost effective way of providing a suitable way of doing this. If a person remains active longer then this surely would benefit the NHS in other ways since an active individual is better than a static one. ~ Why are there financial limitations on key hole surgery for the hip when knee surgery is commonplace and works? |
Submitted by | 2 patient/carers, 2 clinicians, 1 carer/clinician |
PSP information | |
---|---|
PSP unique ID | 0041 |
PSP name | Early Hip and Knee Osteoarthritis |
Total number of uncertainties identified by this PSP. | 52 (To see a full list of all uncertainties identified, please see the detailed spreadsheet held on the JLA website) |
Date of priority setting workshop | 26 February 2016 |