Priority 17 from the Digital Technology for Mental Health PSP
| UNCERTAINTY: What is the evidence that digital interventions increase access to underserved populations and don't exclude groups with mental health problems on the basis of income level, age or confidence using digital technology? (JLA PSP Priority 17) | |
|---|---|
| Overall ranking | 17 |
| JLA question ID | 0069/17 |
| Explanatory note | Not available for this PSP |
| Evidence |
No systematic reviews identified |
| Health Research Classification System category | Mental Health |
| Extra information provided by this PSP | |
|---|---|
| Original uncertainty examples | How can the potential for discrimination be avoided? ~ Is it discriminatory to have groups for or excluding particular diagnosis? ~ Would it be accessible to wider audiences? ~How will you make technology accessible for those in low-income backgrounds? ~ How will you reach marginalized populations? |
| Submitted by | 8 x Service User ~ 3 x Carer ~ 5 x Practitioner |
| PSP information | |
|---|---|
| PSP unique ID | 0069 |
| PSP name | Digital Technology for Mental Health |
| Total number of uncertainties identified by this PSP. | 134 (To see a full list of all uncertainties identified, please see the detailed spreadsheet held on the JLA website) |
| Date of priority setting workshop | 12 March 2018 |