Priority 14 from the Broken Bones of the Upper Limb in People over 50
UNCERTAINTY: Does when, how and who manipulates an upper limb fracture (returns the fractured bone to its normal position) influence outcome in people over 50? (JLA PSP Priority 14) | |
---|---|
Overall ranking | 14 |
JLA question ID | 0093/14 |
Explanatory note | Not available |
Evidence |
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Fractures (non-complex): assessment and management (NG38). London: NICE, 2016. Handoll HHG, Madhok R; Closed reduction methods for treating distal radial fractures in adults. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2003, Issue 1 |
Health Research Classification System category | Injuries and Accidents |
Extra information provided by this PSP | |
---|---|
Original uncertainty examples | Who should reduce the fracture? ~ Is there any benefit to paramedics trying to reduce an obviously deformed wrist? ~ Should the ambulance crew reduce the deformity for analgesia? ~ Is splinting and/or reduction deemed adequate by upper limb specialists? ~ Is there a golden time frame in which it is recommended to reduce a dislocation, and by whom? ~ What is the best way to reduce a distal radius fracture in ED? ~ Is there a relationship between the time of fracture reduction and long term pain relief and hand functions? |
Submitted by | 32 x Healthcare Professionals, 12 x Patients, 3 x Carers / Relatives |
PSP information | |
---|---|
PSP unique ID | 0093 |
PSP name | Broken Bones of the Upper Limb in People over 50 PSP |
Total number of uncertainties identified by this PSP. | 50 (To see a full list of all uncertainties identified, please see the detailed spreadsheet held on the JLA website) |
Date of priority setting workshop | 3 December 2018 |