Making a difference
James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnerships (PSPs) have the potential to impact on the people who participate in them, the organisations that coordinate them, on the public profile of the conditions they are focused on and, of course, on the research that gets done.
Measuring impact however is a challenge and the influence of PSPs can take time to emerge.
Measuring impact however is a challenge and the influence of PSPs can take time to emerge.
What is the impact of PSPs?
In this section, we aim to bring together the available information on the difference PSPs have made. However, we’re aware that we won’t know about all of the work that is happening and all of the achievements that PSPs have made. Do get in touch if you know of something we should mention.
Funders and researchers need time to respond to a PSP's priorities, and work out exactly what research needs to be carried out to address them. This is an essential step in ensuring that funds and resources are genuinely focused on the issues that will benefit patients and clinicians.
Themes across PSP priorities
Research was conducted to identify overarching topics or themes common to the Top 10 research priorities from UK-based James Lind Alliance (JLA) PSPs in different areas of health and care. Visit the research project page to explore the themes via an interactive PDF tool.
Making the most of PSP priorities in research applications
In September 2019 Professor Hywel Williams, then Director of the National Institute for Health and Care Research Health Technology Assessment Programme, issued a video message about how researchers can make the most of PSP priorities when applying for funding to research them.