Revision Knee Replacement Engagement Summary

Gathering uncertainties

Methods used (e.g. survey, focus groups, interviews):

Online and paper survey, recruitment help via PPI groups in regional centres

	Number	%
Total respondents (across all methods)	294	100%
Total patients and carers / spouses	137/34	50 %/12%
Total health and care professionals	123	46%
Total number of original uncertainties submitted	769	100%
Original uncertainties in scope	642	83%
Original uncertainties out of scope	127	17%

Interim prioritisation

Methods used (eg survey, focus groups, interviews):

Ranking survey – online and paper

	Number	%
Total number of indicative questions (answered & unanswered)	32	100
Number of verified answered questions	nil	-
Number of verified unanswered questions	32	100
Number of verified unanswered questions included in the interim prioritisation	32
Total respondents (across all methods)	201	100
Total patients and carers	100	50
Total health and care professionals	101	50
Number of questions taken to final workshop	25

Final priority setting workshop

	Number	%
Total participants	24	100
Total patients and carers	12	50
Total health and care professionals	12	50

Notes:

On initial survey respondents could declare both personal and professional experiences of problematic knee replacement – e.g. a physiotherapist or surgeon with additional experience as a carer hence sum of numbers > 100%